Main IndexAuto Repair Home Search Posts SEARCH
POSTS
Who's Online WHO'S
ONLINE
Log in LOG
IN









valve damage


Search for (search options)
 



GlennAB1
User

Aug 30, 2009, 3:52 PM

Post #1 of 4 (3020 views)
valve damage Sign In

I've always heard it refered to as; The engine "dropped a valve," "sucked a valve," "ate a valve," "swallowed a valve," "injested a valve."

Not long ago I heard someone say; The engine "threw a valve." I thought, engines threw/throw rods, but not valves. What do you all think?

What's the proper terminology?


Sig removed

(This post was edited by Hammer Time on Sep 8, 2009, 1:11 AM)


DanD
Veteran / Moderator
DanD profile image

Aug 30, 2009, 10:13 PM

Post #2 of 4 (3004 views)
Re: valve damage Sign In

Some say tomato some say to-ma-to; I’m not sure there is proper terminology for this? Even if there was; it would end up meaning the same thing; the valve(s) are now NFG (no further good).

Dan.

Canadian "EH"






Loren Champlain Sr
Veteran / Moderator
Loren Champlain Sr profile image

Sep 1, 2009, 12:10 PM

Post #3 of 4 (2991 views)
Re: valve damage Sign In

NFG (No further good)? Really? That's not what NFG means here. Wink
Loren
SW Washington


GlennAB1
User

Sep 1, 2009, 2:22 PM

Post #4 of 4 (2985 views)
Re: valve damage Sign In


In Reply To
NFG (No further good)? Really? That's not what NFG means here. Wink



We use NFG..... and AFU. All Furthered Up.

(This post was edited by Hammer Time on Sep 7, 2009, 1:02 PM)






 
 
 






Search for (options) Privacy Sitemap